Technological changes often bring new terms of use
that often fall into linguistic contradiction with the terms used in
traditional technologies. These contradictions must be clarified so that they
do not become an obstacle in the implementation of the new solutions. This is
the case of the term audience.
Audience in the traditional technologies of diffusion
of messages represented by mass media like radio, television and press refers
to a public that receives the
message of a passive way, without being able to express an opinion or critic
to the sender by the content of the message. This form of use of the term
audience fits perfectly into the linguistic definition of the term (1).
But what about the new technologies of message diffusion such as social network
web platforms?
In digital social networks users dynamically exchange
the roles of sender and receiver of messages, talking about the content
message. In this context, the term audience is contradictory, being virtual communities the term that
really describes the characteristics of the public that interacts or talks about a particular topic.
Thus, it is necessary to have a clear definition of
virtual communities. The revision of several articles and documents allows me
to propose the following definition:
It is a group of actors (people
or organizations) that have an intensity of conversations between them that is
greater than the intensity of conversations that they have with the rest of the
actors of the social network. The intensity (low, intermediate or high) will
depend on the common interests (hobbies, goals, projects, lifestyles, etc.)
that exist between the actors, regardless of whether they belong to a formal or
informal network structure
This clarification is important, because the correct
identification of virtual communities is a vital element for the implementation
of a digital communication plan that
is part of a digital marketing strategy,
since it will allow the design of precise message contents that seek to promote
the achievement of strategic objectives such as: increase the demand for
products and/or services (commercial
marketing), increase the social benefits of a location (social marketing), increase the voters
of a candidate (political marketing),
etc.
In this way, through the digital communication plan,
the message will be placed in the virtual community and actions will be carried
out that will encourage conversations around this message, which will generate
feedback that will be useful to evaluate and control the performance of the
strategy of digital marketing.
Likewise, it will be of great value for the digital
communication plan to know how these virtual communities are grouped
(polarized-unified, fragmented-grouped or diffusion-support), since with this
information one can have a clearer idea of the segments that compose the
target.
Identifying the common interests underlying virtual
communities as well as types of communities corresponds to an organizational
process called social listening. In
future blogs I will comment on some of the works I have developed in this topic
using social network analysis.
Leopoldo Martínez D.
Links:
No hay comentarios.:
Publicar un comentario